Tags
asleep, at the scent of the water, c3, c3 global, c3 of, c3 oxford falls, C3 Presence, C3 Presence 2012, C3 Presence Conference, C3 Presence Conference 2012, C3 sydney, C3i, ccc, ccc of, cccof, Chris Pringle, Christian City Church, christian city church global, christian city church international, Christian City Church Oxford Falls, Christian City Church Sydney, devil, dour slap, nap, napping, Phil Pringle, power nap, Presence, Presence Conference, Presence Conference 2012, Pringle, satan, sleep, temptation
From ‘Thoughts From My Reformed Self‘, Stokes writes this review on Chris Pringle’s Presence Conference Session on 13/04/2012.
C3’s Chris Pringle Butchers the Gospel In Job to Teach Prosperity Heresy
I’ve already reviewed one message from the Presence Conference in Sydney and have already seen enough to convince me that no one should attend this conference unless as a rescue mission to evangelize the lost that can only become more lost than they were before by believing anything that’s taught here. But we are building a case and making an argument and, keeping that goal in mind, there can never be too much evidence.
For more on the entire C3 Church Movement headed up by Phil Pringle and his wife, a great source is C3Churchwatch blog.
So this time I am reviewing a “sermon” that makes Steven Furtick seem like a breath of fresh air. Chris Pringle already has a strike against her as I consider her preaching because she is a woman who is not only defying the biblical mandate against women teaching groups including men, but further defies God’s word because she holds the office of co-pastor of C3 Church in Sydney with her husband Phil Pringle. Since the Bible clearly forbids women from holding this office in the church, we know right off what low regard Ms. Pringle has for the authority of God’s Word.
But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet, 13 For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.” (1 Tim. 2:12-13).
“Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach (1 Tim. 3:2)
So there’s one strike, but she has enough strikes to finish off a full lineup through all nine innings! These are the big strikes, which accompany the strikes against her throughout the sermon. First, this message is not about Jesus. It is not taken from the Bible. It is not about the gospel. It is, however, packed with narrative of the history of C3 church, with a heavy dose of anecdotes from the life of Phil and Chris Pringle.
The title of Chris Pringle’s message is “The Scent of Water”. Before you write off that title as ridiculous, in all fairness, that phrase does appear in Job 14, but she fails to present a message that really has anything to do with water or anything that water represents. Instead, she centers the message around the idea of seeds and trees. Sometimes the seed is a dream, sometimes it’s a person. Sometimes the tree is your dream, sometimes it’s you and sometimes it’s the church. Sometimes you’re supposed to bury your seed and let it die. Sometimes you’re supposed to be the seed and reach up to the “scent of water”. Sometimes you’re supposed to shut it in a woodshed and forget about it. (You think I’m kidding, don’t you. Just wait and see for yourself.) As erratic as her imagery may be, her speaking style is more so. I lost count of the times she interrupted herself. Chris Pringle is a world class bunny trailer.
I also sense much untruth in her little stories. I would lay bets that the anecdote supposedly pulled from their early marriage in the middle of this message is more of a yarn or a tall tale. I will make a case for that notion, but admittedly can’t prove it. But my suspicions are not unfounded.
Sidebar to Address an Annoying Habit Among Modern Worship Bands.
I’ve been told by my husband, who used to play keyboard for a worship band, that what I witness at the beginning of this video is called “vamping”. Here is what I’m talking about. The video opens with the end of a worship song. There is no telling what song, because the way they draw out the finale always comes out sounding the same. The female vocalist always wails emotionally above the sound of the band, following no particular melody and maybe repeating stock phrases such as “Oh, Lord” or “We love you, Jesus”. The guitars are pounding one or two chords over and over and over, and the drums draw out a final cymbal-crashing finale over several minutes. All of this is provided with a backdrop of a video of a glittery waterfall pattern, designed to mesmerize. Everyone on stage is most definitely caught up “in the Spirit” because they have their eyes squinched tight and hands raised. So this is called “vamping”? That’s appropriate, I think, considering it’s obviously designed to seduce.
vamp2 [vamp]
noun 1.a seductive woman who uses her sensuality to exploit men.
verb 2. to use feminine charms upon; seduce.
Here I’ll start the “play-by-pay” of Chris Pringle’s morning session. I started out making links that go straight to certain spots in the video, but that started becoming too time consuming so they cease about 20 minutes in:
0:40 Music leader asks everyone to pray for floodgates to open on their neighbor. Sounds dangerous! C3′s hazard insurance premiums are going to go through the roof!!
1:15 Music Leader starts speaking in “tongues”. No interpreter. And I know from personal experience that this is a skill that you can learn to exhibit on demand. Not buying it though he’s making it more believable than some do. Chris Pringle’s efforts, which are on display towards the end of this video, display a need for more practice to be convincing. The music leader follows his burst of babble with a series of bumper-sticker phrases back to back – altogether lacking in meaning or grammatical sense.
2:52 Finally winding down the “vamping” to outline agenda for the evening.
3:43 Encouraging crowd to applaud a pastor in the audience from Lausanne, Switzerland. Ahhhh, Lausanne, hometown of the ecumenical movement. He’s being congratulated for breaking 600 in attendance at their particular C3 site. These interludes between music and message are giving me flashback to my days in sales. They sound suspiciously like they’re conducting a sales rally, complete with shout-outs to the regional managers who put up the best numbers, etc.
Good grief. Pastor from Lausanne being called up to the stage and asked to pray for everyone, but could he do it in French.
5:22 Swiss Pastor prays in French. I guess we’re going back to the Dark Ages, where it’s acceptable to lead worship in a language the congregation doesn’t understand. He does follow with a separate prayer in English, not a translation, just a different prayer in English. He was way more excited while he prayed in French. Too bad we’ll never know what he was excited about. This was followed up with much silliness from the worship leader about how cool French sounds. Music leader actually instructed audience to make a silly French sound in unison.
8:03 Introduces “Pastor” Chris, listing her many amazing qualities.
10:20 He finally finishes praising “Pastor” Chris, who now takes the stage. She proceeds to pay it forward and praises the crowd for theirmany worthy qualities, and becoming verklempt out of love for her people.
11:30 ”I believe in you, all that God has for you,” she declares. Then she has a moment where she says something more honest than maybe she herself realizes: “This is not a teaching session so put away your notebook.” Kind of begs the question, just what kind of session is this?
11:57 ”There’s a supernatural seed!” Magic beans?
“It’s going to start popping, out of the earth, out of your heart, out of your lives.” Will this require medical attention?
13:00 Introduces daughter, Rebecca, who “works like a Trojan horse”. Odd simile. She is aware, isn’t she, that Trojan horses are made of wood and require the effort of multiple other people just to get them point A to point B?
13:17 Presenting Pastor Phil’s paintings on stage up for sale. She says anyone who things they’re in “fat city” are under a delusion. They need to sell art to pay their bills. So we’re supposed to believe that Phil Pringle is a starving artist? Really? How about selling the Rolex on your wrist, Pastor Phil? That would pay a lot of bills.
14:14 She starts engraining the concept that money is a “supernatural seed”. Very smooth little insertion of the concept here. “We sow that supernatural seed, and now it’s your turn.”
Does sales pitch for Phil’s paintings, complete with the claim that they are “anointed” with the same power that rests on Phil. That’s a bold assertion. By the way, I am an amateur artist and have even painted some through the years. In my amateur opinion, these are not particularly spectacular paintings. I mean, they’re okay. They remind me of greeting cards. And I think I remember from the review I did of the Furtick sermon that they sold one of these for about $30,000. These definitely do not rate that kind of price tag. The only way people are paying that much is because they believe the Spirit of God will somehow come with paintings. Click here to view where she’s showing them on stage.
I am thinking that the punishment for actually has got to worse for collecting money claiming to sell the Spirit than for trying to buy it. And the punishment for the latter was certainly bad for Simon the magician:
18 Now when Simon saw that the Spirit was given through the laying on of the apostles’ hands, he offered them money,19 saying, “Give me this power also, so that anyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit.” 20 But Peter said to him, “May your silver perish with you, because you thought you could obtain the gift of God with money! 21 You have neither part nor lot in this matter, for your heart is not right before God. 22 Repent, therefore, of this wickedness of yours, and pray to the Lord that, if possible, the intent of your heart may be forgiven you. 23 For I see that you are in the gall[c] of bitterness and in the bond of iniquity.”
15:37 Chris introduces Bif and Kim Tyson, members of C3 whom I sense are about to be exploited to tug heart strings and to get emotion flowing in the room. The wife is in a wheel chair and is paralyzed from the waist down from a car accident a year ago. That is certainly horrible and sad but doesn’t it literally add insult to injury that they are about to let themselves be used like puppies are used to sell paper towels?
16:37 ”Bif’s story [the woman in the wheelchair], in my heart, has something to do with the supernatural seed” gushes Chris. She is working hard to insert that “seed” concept whenever possible. Later in the conference, Phil Pringle shamelessly uses this so-called principle to draw money from the attendees.
Chris says they are “sowing their supernatural seed” as she presents as a gift one of Phil’s paintings to the couple. Wow that’s a tiny painting! They chose one so small that I can’t recognize what it’s a painting of. Big applause though. Uh, Pastor Chris. There’s a verse I’d like to share with you:
“Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven. (Matthew 6:1)”
18:03 Soundman Jordie comes to fix mic which is rattling against earring. Did she just make a pass at him?! She was obviously joking, but ew! He’s probably a quarter of her age and she’s the pastor’s wife… or actually she’s one of the pastors.
18:49 She says, apologetically, “I’m going to get to the Bible.” Promises, promises…
19:10 Gratuitous insertion of reference to her making love to her husband. She apparently received these particular earrings while they were… you know…. Thank you so much for that image. Where’s the Ambien? I’m going to need a dreamless sleep tonight. She also decides to share that the mic is caught in her bra. It’s kind of embarrassing the antics they go through to get it untangled. Raucous laughter from the audience.
20:29 ”It’s all about this seed—this relationship”. Oh, I forgot that one. The seed is also a relationship. Got it.
20:38 Okay, this is starting to bug me. She is using Jordie’s mom as an illustration but has forgotten her name. This is the fourth or fifth time within only about 20 minutes of combined Chris Pringle/Phil Pringle footage that I have witnessed them forgetting somebody’s name among those that works on their staff or are part of their church. This is supposed to be the flock they’re shepherding and they don’t even care enough about these people to remember their names! Each time they stumble like this, they try to whitewash over it with flattery. She immediately starts to refer to Helen, whose name she forgot, as her sister.
20:46 Tells story about Wendy (Jordie’s mom) and how she had brain cancer and wasn’t a Christian. She was brought to Jesus and healed of her brain cancer. Jesus did not receive any glory for this, but these things were credited to the life-changing power present in the connect groups at C3. Not a WORD about God, about Jesus, about his healing Power! This is going to be a very long message.
21:35 ”This awesome, supernatural seed is going va-va-va-va-va in the earth.” What is that word? Is that a va-va-va-va-verb?
21:53 Chris refers to the so-called prophecy regarding the filling of the Warragamba Dam.
I have to insert here that there is absolutely nothing so far that would clue anyone in that this is a Christian gathering. Chris is now talking about “God’s supernatural power”. What god? Which god? I think I’m going to stop capitalizing god (as well as her “holy spirit”) until she gives some reason to do otherwise.
22:06 She is just babbling at this point. She is making no sense, but she believes whatever she’s babbling “with all her heart”
22:26 ”You have literally been drawn here by the scent of water.” I think you need to look up what “literal” means. A few sentences later, “There’s something that happens in a seed that’s in the earth… something that’s hidden…. dark, black, possible even dead. I know that the holy spirit today is going to revive and turn things around, supernaturally as you and I lift up, look up to the scent of water.” I refuse to capitalize this woman’s holy spirit.
23:05 Chris Pringle has a severe case of A.D.D. She gets scattered and stalls and follows every possible bunny trail. For instance, she just came to an abrupt stop to address the band behind her. She realizes they had not been dismissed and wondered if they minded still being on stage. She then inquires of someone in the front row (Phil?) if the band is distracting. I have to answer for her not half so distracting as her self-inflicted interruptions! She then shows remorse for bringing up the subject, thinking they might feel unwanted and tells them that she loves having them up there because they’re her kids, all of them, and she’s “Momma Chris”. Then immediately admits to not knowing the name of the girl on the drums, which rather spoiled the effect of her little speech.
Informed of the drummer’s name, Chris is flustered as if she ought to have known her name. (Yes, she should have.) Chris then remarks on their striking resemblance to Erica and Darlene. This gives evidence that she doesn’t know any of them well or their faces would be quite distinct from one another. A brief attempt to get back on track lasted about two seconds before stops again inquire how she’s doing on time. At this point, this is a valid concern since her various self-inflicted interruptions have probably eaten up the clock. It shows a lack of respect for those in the audience who paid money for this conference. She seems quite unprepared and doesn’t seem to concerned, though, that she’s wasting the time they paid for.
24:28 Starts talking about Steven Furtick’s message and how she had a flashback to her life in the80s while Steven was preaching.
25:00 Chris asserts that that her holy spirit moves and speaks in those times our mind wanders. She’s making a case, it seems, that those with A.D.D. are spiritually gifted. She’s encouraging an undisciplined mind here and making it a virtue.
25:18 Chris says the holy spirit wants to get us to reach up to the scent of water. If this is true, her holy spirit is going to have to train me how I reach for a smell and what water smells like exactly.
25:44 Out of the blue, interrupts herself again to tell the audience that she has lost 10 kilos and not 12 as she had claimed yesterday. This couldn’t be more out of place. I think she has no ability to keep thoughts that pop into her had from popping right out of her mouth.
26:55 Another bunny trail to announce Phil’s 60th birthday is next month. Feels the need to share their vacation plans and says something that I gather is inappropriate, but she’s using Australian slang, with which I’m unfamiliar. It might be really bad for all I know, so I’m going to not quote her.
26:28 Says guiltily and apologetically, “I’ve got to get onto the message. I’ve almost read a scripture… It’s part of a scripture.” We’re almost a half-hour in. That would be nice. But is that all we’re probably going to get? A verse? Part of a verse? “Don’t worry about what I’m saying. Just pick up the good vibes. Okay?” Wow… she’s getting her theology from the Beach Boys?
26:56 ”I’m going to get to this little supernatural seed, and it’s a trick. There’s a trick in the supernatural seed. It’s actually in the natural seed as well.” This sentence makes absolutely no sense to me! I’m lost. Chris then circles back to continue to her earlier story about her flashback to the 80′s. Here, Chris talks at length about the history of C3 and its humble beginnings. ” Phil was, blah, blah, blah… and I was blah, blah, blah… and we were blah, blah, blah….” Can we have something more along the lines of “Jesus did…”, “God ordained…”, and “His Spirit has…” and pull from their story that’s already been recorded for us?
29:06 ”Some things, we can’t see but god can see. It’s hidden in the earth. We don’t know it yet. Some of your pastors and leaders are there right now.” I have a prediction that the magic trick for getting the seed out of its hiding place is to plant more seeds. In the world of rosperity preachers, “seed” always means money.
29:37 ”Every day, we were reading this book by T.L. and Daisy Osborne. A Daily Guide to Miracles.” Hmmm…. This is the title of a book by Oral Roberts. The actual title is A Daily Guide to Miracles and Successful Living through Seed-Faith. When I look up the authors she just cited, I find that T.L. Osborn was Roberts partner in street evangelistic meetings in the 1930′s. Here is my first piece of evidence that she’s making this story up. If this book had so much meaning to them, she would have remembered who wrote it. What I suspect really happened is that she pulled this quote off of Osborn’s website and assumed it was Osborn’s quote. Then decided to build an entire fictitious anecdote around the quote.
30:20 ”The holy spirit said to me ‘Go home and get that painting’” Claiming direct divine revelation, but as we’ve covered already, no reason to believe this is the Lord. She does this so many times in this hour-long message, it would make the review far too long to cite every instance.
30:44 ”T.L. had said in this chapter, ‘take your very best, the cream of your heart, and sow it to God.’” As we already covered, if this came from the book, Roberts said it, not T.L. This quote was hand-picked as words well-crafted to move the audience to take their “best” and give it away and this will unleash god’s blessing. She’s priming the pump to convince them to give away their best. She said this about the one finished painting and it really doesn’t make much sense: “Right then and there, I sowed Sydney. I sowed Sydney; I put it in the earth. I covered it up. And I shut the woodshed door.” Chris has stopped making sense. She sowed Sydney? Is Sydney the earth? Is Sydney a seed? How do you “sow” a city? I suppose Chris would accuse me of not seeing with my spiritual eyes. I don’t think that’s the problem though. This language, all of it, is foreign to the language I find in scripture.
31:50 ”I know, as I was praying this morning, the Lord said to me some of you have to shut the woodshed door. You’ve got to shut the door and trust god with that seed.” This cracks me up! I can’t help hearing now the recurring line from the movie Cold Comfort Farm: “I saw something NASTY in the woodshed!” And by the way, what she shut in the woodshed was Phil’s only finished painting, the only means by which they would possibly make any money. I have a REAL hard time believing that these people passed up the chance to auction off a painting like this. She has it up there as a prop on stage and I have a hard time believing that this painting survived all these years because of sentimentality. I’m thinking he painted this one for the occasion, or maybe to have many occasions where they use this same story.
32:50 Chris finally reads from Scripture:
John 12:24 “Very truly I tell you, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds.”
Now the Amplified: “I assure you, most solemnly I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just one grain, it never becomes more, but lives by itself alone, but if it dies, it produces many others and yields a rich harvest.”
The Message: Listen carefully. Unless a grain of wheat is buried in the ground, dead to the world, it is never any more than a grain of wheat. But if it is buried, it sprouts and reproduces itself many times over.
33:55 And then, as if she’s summing up that one verse (do we really need a summary of one verse?) she says, “Even though you can’t see it, the tree is definitely in the seed”. I think she’s missed the point of the passage. This is wheat, not an acorn. It multiplies rather than grow into one big thing. But that doesn’t fit her purposes of preaching about big dreams, so she’d rather ignore that. Not to mention the whole passage surrounding this verse is about denying yourself and taking up your cross, which would sound quite foreign coming out of Chris Pringle’s mouth. Now she’s going back into their life story and talking about how attractive Phil was back then. Says something about Phil in bicycle shorts. Ugh! Please stop!
34:44 While riding his bike in 1980, god spoke to Phil and asked him to go to Littleton. The lesson here, apparently, is they let Sydney die (their desire to have the church in Sydney) and so a door opened in Littleton. This is law, not living under grace. It’s a quid pro quo.
35:30 She says that if the seed (and it’s left to your own creativity and imagination as to what your particular seed might be) is buried in the earth, “leave it dead because something’s about to happen. Here’s what I’m going to say. It’s not just about planting a church…. Growing a church… It’s the DNA, the supernatural connections of the DNA in that seed is what is going to cause that seed to go POP! Snap, Crackle, Pop in the earth!” Again, she’s speaking a foreign language.
36:30 Chris is still talking about her life and of trees and seeds. She keeps producing strange sound effects to describe the rumbling seed as well as many sentence fragments and incomplete thoughhts.
36:58 ”The lord said, I’ve given you this city.” This is a grand claim indeed. Sort of the opposite of what Jesus did when he turned down being given all the kingdoms of the world. This is not biblical language unless you go all the way back to Joshua where God commanded the Israelite army to commit entire cities to destruction. We have been given a very specific kind of authority, according to Matthew 28:18: To proclaim the gospel, to batize and to teach all Jesus commanded.
37:04 Chris makes a statement you can tell she’s proud of. She utters, as if an oracle of god, “When we want to, we’re not ready. When we’re ready, we don’t want to.” This amazing insight drew a round of applause. I guess it just sounded so deep and inscrutable, the audience decided that it must be amazingly wise. Phil is in the audience grinning, as if his wife has just proven her utter genius. She follows this up with, “When we’re cocky, god’s not interested. When we’re freaking out, crapping our pants. We’re ready. When we’re hiding in the wine press…That’s when god puts our hand on us.” Crass language aside, this is again a quid pro quo. We receive from God when we have our act straight.
37:55 We need to make sure we do it right. (More law, no grace, no gospel. It’s all about what we have to do. Have you got anything for someone who doesn’t have it all together?) We must do what god wants because we have to make sure the conditions are right for the seed to go “pop”. (Wow I’m glad to have exited this religious culture full of pressure to make sure we’re “doing it right” so that we don’t “miss God’s will”. It’s very freeing to know that we do not have the ability to get in God’s way. He’s quite a bit stronger than us.)
38:05 ”We need to listen to our leaders and make sure it’s the right place, the right time.” Okay, this is a biggie. She’s asserting that she and Phil are god’s mouthpiece and the populace had better listen to them or their seed’s not going to “pop”.
38:24 Getting Veklempt again, thanking her husband for listening to the holy spirit. “Thank you, babe!”
39:12 Still talking about the story of C3. Asks C3 Pastors to stand up to be honored with applause for, I guess, letting their seed die. It’s interesting that the one verse she’s read so far happens to be one that does not mention Jesus. This is natural since Jesus was the one who said it, but we the audience doesn’t know that because she didn’t read the verse in context.
39:49 ”Look at you! This is our seed! This is our DNA!” Veklempt.
39:58 Chris has an honest moment: “My message is in sort of bits. I’m sorry. But that’s just how I am. I’m all in bits.”
40:15 Chris introduces a little gum tree prop. Still talking about the story of the beginning of C3 church.
41:20 ”The supernatural seed is protected by the power of the holy spirit…. That’s why Habbakuk says, “Wait, wait, wait… keep your expectations high. Just wait…” Habbakuk says what?? Well, it could be she’s talking about this. It’s a popular verse among those who expect special revelation from God. But what this verse is talking about waiting for is God’s judgment, which is quickly approaching:
Write the vision;
make it plain on tablets,
so he may run who reads itFor still the vision awaits its appointed time;
it hastens to the end—it will not lie.
If it seems slow, wait for it;
it will surely come; it will not delay. (Habakkuk 2:2-3)
Chris continues on to give the pastors there a pep talk. Chris says if they don’t have that “positive expectation”, then get with someone who does. This sounds like “Hitch your wagon to a star.” Again, this brings me back to my sales days, except it’s starting to be more reminiscent of my very first sales job in Mary Kay.
42:08 That’s why Habakkuk says, “Write it down. Make it real plain. Date it.” I see the write it down part, but not the “date it”. That sounds more like a quote from a book on setting goals. And Habakkuk was told something specific to write down. Is she claiming everyone there is to expect revelation with the same authority as what Habakkuk received?
42:40 Now talking about the original land purchase back in 1980. How is this not boring the audience to tears? But she’s treating it like some story that will effect life change: “The story of C3 church is the power of God unto salvation for everyone who believes”. Wait a minute. That doesn’t sound right.
42:50 Chris is now reminiscing about a tree-planting day C3 celebrated, which I predict will turn out to be a momentous event with great spiritual significant. Chris and Phil planted a tree which looked like it was going to die which, of course, is just like your vision which looks sick and dying.
44:07 ”He used to be a tree-hugger, my man, when he was on acid.” Niiiiiice.
44:30 Big picture of big tree put up onto the screen. This is supposedly proof that if you just believe, your dream can grow from a sickly little seed… or tree… or bad idea… or something… like… ummm… never mind.
44:54 The holy spirit said to her to get a painting and bring it today – a painting of two women fetching water. Chris assumed it must have special meaning for “someone here today” to not give up. “Draw water. Draw water from the wells of salvation.” What? Is that a verse? If it is, she must have just googled it so she could throw in a verse at this point. But she didn’t cite it so I’ll look it up. Here it is in context:
You will say in that day:
“I will give thanks to you, O Lord,
for though you were angry with me,
your anger turned away,
that you might comfort me.2 “Behold, God is my salvation;
I will trust, and will not be afraid;
for the Lord God is my strength and my song,
and he has become my salvation.”3 With joy you will draw water from the wells of salvation. (Isaiah 12:1-3)
Chris Pringle has managed to quote the one verse in the passage that implies our part in the matter. God as our savior is absent from anything she quotes.
45:17 Speaks for a while on how we should speak nice things to our little tree and hug it and don’t be mean to it and criticize our tree. Awww… poor little tree. /sigh/
46:15 Rains are coming, floodgates of heaven are open. This is really kind of boring me. This is boilerplate prosperity-speak. When did the sappy music start? I didn’t notice. But it’s apparently time for it, because she’s gotten to the “You could be here today…” part.
46:35 ”We want you in the family tree. Turn to your neighbor and say, ‘I’m in your family tree’” This is a versatile tree. She’s shifted her metaphor. The tree – it’s a dream, it’s a church, it’s everything but what was originally intended in the text.
46:51 ”Here’s my scripture, and it’s the scripture of my message.” She says in a tone of voice that says, oops, I sure got off track, because she proceeds to cite a verse that she hasn’t even mentioned yet: Job 14:7 “Even a tree has more hope.” What? Let me look up this verse:
For there is hope for a tree,
if it be cut down, that it will sprout again,
and that its shoots will not cease.
What translation is she reading from? And she only read a third of one verse. She’s talking about this as if this verse is about giving encouragement to people who have been discouraged in their dreams. How dare she compare the type of thing she’s talking about with what Job went through. He lost all his children. He’s covered in boils. He lost his fortune in a moment.
47:28 Reaching up to the “scent of water” again, then proceeds to finish reading Job 14:7 and a few more verses following. Oh, so here’s where the “scent of water” came from. The plant reaches up to the scent of water. She said the “holy spirit quickened this verse to her.” In other words, she was reading this and suddenly was filled with her own bright ideas. Here is what she read:
For there is hope for a tree,
if it be cut down, that it will sprout again,
and that its shoots will not cease.
Though its root grow old in the earth,
and its stump die in the soil,
yet at the scent of water it will bud
and put out branches like a young plant. (Job 14:7-9)
Here is what follows it:
But a man dies and is laid low;
man breathes his last, and where is he?
As waters fail from a lake
and a river wastes away and dries up,
so a man lies down and rises not again;
till the heavens are no more he will not awake
or be roused out of his sleep.
Oh that you would hide me in Sheol,
that you would conceal me until your wrath be past,
that you would appoint me a set time, and remember me!
If a man dies, shall he live again?
All the days of my service I would wait,
till my renewal should come.
You would call, and I would answer you;
you would long for the work of your hands.
For then you would number my steps;
you would not keep watch over my sin;
my transgression would be sealed up in a bag,
and you would cover over my iniquity. (Job 14:10-17)
This is the gospel! She’s right on its doorstep! This is about how we are like that tree, cut down, seemingly dead, but only asleep. And Job is trusting God to call him on the last day, but after his wrath has past and that his sins stay buried, but he will rise up at his voice. This is about the resurrection on the last day.
For we know Job says later in chapter 19:
For I know that my Redeemer lives,
and at the last he will stand upon the earth.
And after my skin has been thus destroyed,
yet in
my flesh I shall see God,(Job 19:25-26)
Wow, she’s right on the doorstep of a beautiful gospel passage, but she has absolutely no interest in that, because that will not help her and Phil build their C3 kingdom.
48:00 Getting crowd whipped up. She repeats various concepts about seeds, saplings, and scent of water and throws in some tongue babbling.
49:00 ”I’m going to tell you a little story”. Oh, goodie! It’s story time with Mama Chris. Oh my goodness, what comes next is just painful. She mentions someone in the band who she says she loves. Chris says she’s his “white mama”. And she says then that of course he’s got a mother. She proceeds to succumb to the irrational need to mention her ethnicity. She stumbles between whether to call her white or colored and you can tell Julian is uncomfortable and embarrassed for her. Why was that information even necessary? It just provided an opportunity to put her foot in her mouth. Chris goes on to explain that she has added him into her family tree and he’s now one of her sons. Julian just got married and apparently Chris performed the ceremony.
50:05 Chris says god wants us to see the invisible, supernatural seed of destiny in young men and young women. Okay… seed of destiny. Got it.
50:30 /sigh/ Now she’s talking to the little tree.
51:50 Starts singing snippet of some rain song.
51:40 She’s going to pray over Julian and he’s going to represent a seed of the future in our churches represented here to breathe upon this new seed.” She instructs all the musicians in the audience to stand up to be prayed over and she prays for god to “pop that seed in him.” She ends “In the name of Jesus.” First mention of Jesus.
53:00 Now talking more about C3 and what they do… blah, blah, blah. Then more about Chris’ life story. “God spoke to me… I had this revelation: everywhere I went, all the fruit, all the seed, all the trees, that were coming up with new life were through the church.” Scratch, scratch, scratch those itching ears. She then says she made a vow that she was not going to make Kone famous but make Jesus Christ famous. And may I say… epic fail. You are showing yourself inept at making Jesus famous. She spends the next several minutes telling Chris Pringle’s story. Also tells about some girl in Uganda with a tragic story, and C3 became her hero.
58:37 LOL! Is Phil Pringle asleep!?
59:05 Video about girl in Uganda. Apparently a testimonial of how much better her quality of life is now thanks to C3.
1:01:00 Instructing everyone to lift their hands to heaven to the “scent of water”.
1:01:25 Praying. Floodgates of heaven and more “pop, pop, pop”. “Up, up, up” over and over again. “Thank you Lord that you rebirth vision.” He does? Where do you find that in the Bible? “Let that dream flicker, flicker, flicker. Breath upon it holy spirit.” She’s apparently now seeing all sorts of things and relaying what’s in her mind’s eye.
1:03:19 Instructing everyone to pray in the spirit, then starts babbling. Making up her own repetitive song now, full up nonsense about rising and stretching and coming out of the earth. I’m so ready for this to be over. I’m pretty sure what she’s doing right now is supposedly prophetically singing, singing what are supposedly words from the lord over the people interspersed with tongue-babbling.
1:05:12 Now declaring seeds are popping and churches are coming out of oblivion. Coincidentally, I find myself wishing for oblivion at this point. “Send us to the graces of the earth.” Pardon? That sentence has no meaning. Music has been growing constantly in intensity. But soon softens. She’s getting ready for the hypnotic portion. She’s talking in that rhythmic way. It doesn’t matter what she says. It’s rocking the brain to sleep. “Paint your brush across our souls Lord, so that we’ll be attractive to others. So we’ll be irresistible.” That sounds just a bit like a description of the devil. He is covered in a disguise as an angel of light.
1:08:08 Putting in plug to register for a Women’s conference.
1:08:36 Music leader comes up. Giving instructions for stuff happening later that day aaaaand… we’re done.
Please pray for these people who have attended these conferences that they may hear the real gospel, that the Lord of the Harvest would send workers into the field. And pray for the wolves, these deceivers to be exposed.” – Cindy Stokes, C3’s Chris Pringle Butchers the Gospel In Job to Teach Prosperity Heresy, Thoughts From My Reformed Self, http://thoughtsfrommyreformedself.com/2012/05/12/c3s-chris-pringle-butchers-the-gospel-in-job-to-teach-prosperity-heresy/, 12/05/2012. (Accessed 19/05/2012.)
What’s the C3 terminology? Do they call it “Chris’s ‘session’? Anyway whatever they call it the imagination could go beserk. My terminology would be Chris’s looney tunes show!
Half the video is fiddling around with the microphone. The young guy spends a few minutes with his arms wrapped around her…then she has to untangle the mic from her bra….he he he-so funny!
I’m sure the sparse audience loves the part- “we’re done”!
I can’t believe she talked to a tree. I’m sorry. That just makes Christianity look stupid to unbelievers present.
At 14:14mins of the video referred to above, the comments refer to “some paintings” and continues on about the review of Steve Furtick and believing the paintings went for $30,000.
Incorrectly deducted (should you go watch that piece of video), that one or all of those paintings are worth $30,000.
The painting that sold for $30,000 was approx 1.6 m high and over 2m wide. Ps Phil had hoped to raise $40,000 for this painting and to give the money to charity (such as those that are helped by c3 in Beyond). The painting sold by silent auction for $30,000 thus meeting the reserve price.
This is why it is always best to be there yourself to see for yourself, and not be mislead, yet again, by the c3churchwatch website.
“The painting that sold for $30,000 was approx 1.6 m high and over 2m wide.”
And you think that if some pompous imbecile throws some paint onto a canvas of that size, it’s worth $30,000 because the pompous imbecile in question also happens to be well-known?
Any four year old child can paint better than Phil Pringle, whose “art” is as big a con job as his “preaching”. Sadly, there are just as many impressionable fools who are willing to heed the latter as there are willing to shell out for the former.
The man is a complete and utter joke – and a bad one, at that.
“This is why it is always best to be there yourself to see for yourself, and not be mislead, yet again, by the c3churchwatch website.”
“See for yourself”? Cindy runs the blog ‘Thoughts From My Reformed Self’. She wrote the above article. Not C3 Church Watch. We ask for correction if people see something wrong. We stress that we do not wish to misrepresent the C3 movement.
Yet you think we honestly mislead? These comments by Chris Pringle are misleading:
“My husband, he never wants to, you know, talk much about his art. Unless he’s giving it away. Which um- That’s cool! That’s great. But you know, that’s awesome. But I want you to buy some of his art so we can pay our bills. Haha! Support the ‘Save The Pringle’ fund.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=w7WVUKlv6a0#t=820s
Phil Pringle was over in C3 San Diego, trying to sell his paintings over there. The flower painting that Chris was trying to sell from the stage at Presence Conference, Phil Pringle tried to sell at San Diego:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=91mnk7vvL8E#t=164s
And Cindy’s comment stands about Chris doing a “sales pitch for Phil’s paintings, complete with the claim that they are “anointed” with the same power that rests on Phil”. Chris did say:
“Art kind of carries the Presence of God.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=w7WVUKlv6a0#t=866s
Cindy’s scripture rebuttal is right on the money (literally). It is sinful to encourage Christians to buy the Spirit of God. Cindy linked the videos to her articles so people can check what she wrote alongside the actual sermon.
You said Trina that, “At 14:14mins of the video referred to above, the comments refer to “some paintings” and continues on about the review of Steve Furtick and believing the paintings went for $30,000”
Believe it or not, Cindy said “AND I THINK I REMEMBER from the review I did of the Furtick sermon that they sold one of these for about $30,000” (emphasis mine).
She didn’t state this factually. She offered her view from memory. She didn’t offer it as fact. Would you like to take back your misleading comment?
That comment being:
“This is why it is always best to be there yourself to see for yourself, and not be mislead, yet again, by the c3churchwatch website.”
No, Cindy is publishing information that she thinks, not facts
@ Trisha – and sadly, Chris Pringle is speaking out her “vain imaginations”.
That’s the “fruit” when women usurp the role of men, and in rebellion, ignore the biblical instruction to not teach or have authority over men.
And the men reap what they sow, by allowing it.
@ Trisha – speaking as a woman who once firmly held to the “egalitarian” rights of women in ministry, as equal with men, clear reading of the biblical text convinced me otherwise…..so I’m now “complementarian”.
http://carm.org/should-women-be-pastors-and-elders
“No, Cindy is publishing information that she thinks, not facts.”
Not true. Cindy is more than capable to tell readers when she is thinking or remembering something don’t you think?
I’ll repeat what I said above:
Believe it or not, Cindy said “AND I THINK I REMEMBER from the review I did of the Furtick sermon that they sold one of these for about $30,000″ (emphasis mine).
I just realised that Christine Pringle is not understanding the Bible and theology cognitively but rather she’s approaching God via romantic “feelings”.
Had a real “aha” moment listening to a critique of Ann Voskamp’s book “A Thousand Gifts”, and comparing it to Christine Pringle’s display of erratic imagery (as mentioned above by Thoughts From My Reformed Self).
That constant romantic imagery she promotes will push people (women particularly, men being more linear) down an unbiblical road of mysticism.
Chris’ real problem is her failure to believe “what God has said, and by grace obey”.
Hebrews 1:1-2 “God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world.”
On a lighter note, it sounds like she was reading from this version of the bible.
http://apprising.org/2012/05/29/the-attractional-megachurch-bible/
Hi thinker.I think you could be right.It say’s ,” The Attractional Megachurch Bible is all about YOU!”.Is this the ROCK STAR BIBLE?
he he he Yes! thinker! That seems to be the version that Chris prefers!
Just reading text, by Chris Pringle, on PDF for upcoming Everywoman 2012 Conference…..borderline mysticism or waffle? 🙂
“EMPOWERING AS I WRITE- I’M WATCHING A YACHT SAIL INTO THE WIND! THE DECKS ARE SCRUBBED TEAK- THE MIDNIGHT BLUE HULL MIRRORING THE OCEAN’S SHIMMER AS SHE TILTS. OH HOW I LOVE THAT FEELING OF LEAVING THE SHORE – HOISTING SAILS – WIND IN HAIR – SUN ON SKIN …. AHHH ME HEARTIES! THE PREPARATION SEEMS TO TAKE FOREVER- BUT ONCE THE LAND FADES IN THE DISTANCE AND THE SILENCE OF SEA, SKY, HORIZON STRIPS MY MIND OF EARTHLY GLUE- THE “TRUE NORTH” OF LIFE AND PURPOSE SEEMS ALL SO CLEAR AGAIN! AS WE GATHER FROM THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH FOR EVERYWOMAN 2012 – I SENSE IN MY HEART – YOU TOO, WILL FIND HERE – A PERFECT PLACE TO ‘DROP ANCHOR’ AND LET GOD’S PRESENCE WASH OVER YOU – WHERE HIS PLANS WILL FLOAT ANEW TO THE SURFACE OF YOUR MIND – AND ALL WILL BE CLEAR FOR THE FUTURE. WE HAVE RESTED THE SOIL FOR A YEAR- AND I CAN FEEL NEW SEEDS OF HOPE RISING FROM THE EARTH – REPLENISHED, AND READY FOR THE WIND OF THE HOLY SPIRIT TO SEND THEM ACROSS OUR LANDS, CITIES, CHURCHES, FAMILIES, UNLOCKING DESTINIES IN ALL GENERATIONS …. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY – WITHIN EVERYWOMAN GATHERED.
I LOVE YOU I DO – WITH ALL MY HEART I PRAY YOU BE BLESSED UNTIL WE MEET!
BIGGEST HUGS MUMMA CHRIS
P.S.I HAVE SO MANY THINGS TO SHARE AND I’M SAVING THEM UP FOR YOU!
Chris knows as much about sailing as she does about theology: a yacht doesn’t “tilt”, it heels.
(Perhaps she was thinking of a pinball machine – her brain certainly seems to function like one).
(Just reading text, by Chris Pringle, on PDF for upcoming Everywoman 2012 Conference…..borderline mysticism or waffle?)
Hi Berean.After reading this a few times it sounds like someone that is hooked on a feeling.I have heard similar feelgood statements all to many times.It can come across quite hypnotic.Anyone else think so?
Zorro…love the pinball machine analogy!
Lately, and more precisely since I’ve been involved in this site, I have been reminiscing about the AOG days when we were saved i.e. the Pringles and myself.
The C3 scenario today has it’s roots in the AOG Sydneham. AOG was fine and in fact was agreat church with some fantastic christians and prayer warriors.The pastors Dennis and Barbara Barton,were democratically voted out.The vote was unanimous basically because of their intense involvement with the Pringle’s and their friends.They did stupid things like shoving Phil and Chirs into bed together and using God’s money to send them on a honeymoon.Some of this money was sacrificially given by poor widows for God’s work.The Bartons were fairly voted out. They came to the church on the basis that every few yars the church would vote whether to keep them on board or not.The AOG national board offered the Bartons an Evangelistic position for all of New Zealand. The Bartons rebelled against this and decided to ‘stick it up’ the AOG and start an opposition church. In this rebellion the Pringle’s supported the Bartons and stole over half the flock of the church for their new church.My Bible tells me that rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft. My conclusion is that the church tha the Bartons and Pringles started out of rebellion was therefore influenced by witchcraft. Has anything changed since with the Pringles?
Hello Gary,
In the light of how Phil got his start, don’t you think that it’s more than a little ironic that he demands total obedience from those at C3?
As you probably know, anyone at C3OF who shows less than unwavering loyalty and complete acquiescence is at risk of being shown the door. A culture such as this fairly screams from the rooftops that Phil is a weak and insecure individual who is not at all comfortable in his own skin. It’s a shame that he doesn’t repent and enjoy the freedom that comes only in Christ – in particular the freedom to drop worldly facades and simply be oneself. It’s a heavy load that he’s carrying, and that he’s placing on the shoulders of those in his sway.
Zorro, very ironic.But thre is another twist. Most, if not all of Phil’s so called ‘disciples’ in the early days backslid. Even Phil’s best friends, Anne and Wayne Tyndall, fell by the wayside early on in the piece.In fact right at the beginning the Bartons shoved wayne and Anne into worship leading. Phil brought them to church shortly after he was saved and took them, along with scores of others, to the church the Bartons and the Pringles started when they split up our church.
It’s obvious that Phil’s teaching wasn’t sound back then.He could not hold his converts on the basis of them following the Lord and being established with sound doctrine. Now, out of this insecurity, which you have correctly alluded to, he uses cult tactics to keep the members of C3. The members = $ and the C3 machine runs on the oil of dollars and plenty of them. If it ain’t oiled it will seize up.Some people joke about [Churchwatcher] but I am sure that he is Phil’s worst nightmare because [Churchwatcher] is exposing the deception and when members leave their wallets and check accounts leave.My personal feeling is that the whole organization will seize up this year and implode big time. It was never founded on a solid foundation and will subsequently collapse. Incidentally, the members of our church who refused to be dragged off with the Bartons and Pringles,became sound stable christians because we had biblical, scriptural and sound teaching.
Oh, Garry, you must have heard about the Kev Wilcock’s days and the Chris Harvey crusade way back when.I’m sure a lot of people would like to know about that down here on the south coast.?????Since there were about 6 SOUTH COAST CITY CHURCHES that diminished into 1.”I kid you not”..And now the one is C3 THIRROUL.
Not good. Not good at all. This movement is dangerous.
Eyes, sorry I haven’t heard of Wilcock or Harvey.Even when Pringle split our church at the beginning,and choofed off with the flock, I didn’t really take any interest in what he was doing. In fact, all things work together for good, because when he left (or was grubbed out) it meant he wasn’t propagating his drivel amongst new converts! However, if he left and didn’t steal sheep, and if the sheep remined they would probably still be christians today.
One of the biggest proofs of him being off at the time, is the Tyndalls. They were close friends of Phil’s and also his closest ‘disciples’….’followers’ probably is a more appropriate word.He couldn’t disciple himself so how could he disciple others! When he took the Tyndalls out of AOG Sydneham and sound teaching, and then under his looney tunes teaching, (Phil’s fables) they soon backslid.I doubt that they are christians today.I had heard several years ago when I was in Aus that they were seriously anti church. Think about it!When they were in AOG they were ON FIRE!Then they left and sat under Phil’s teaching they backslid. Phil claims to have over two hundred churches but his two closest friends and first followers won’t have anything to do with church! Nothing adds up when you take a close look at C3.
When he went to Aus I didn’t give a rats what he was doing there.I remember once, about 12 years ago the Bartons visited me and in the course of conversation they said “we are going down to Sydney (on such and such a day) to visit the work there.” I replied “what work?”. Seriously I didn’t have a clue what Pringle was up to.They replied “the work Phil and Chris are doing.” I just said to the Bartons at that time ” Oh, that!” then immediately changed the subject.The Bartons were corect..it is Phil and Chris’s work-not God’s work!
(Eyes, sorry I haven’t heard of Wilcock or Harvey.)Doesn’t matter anyway.The tent of miracles crusade was corrupted by the WILCOCKS/EDDIE CO/WAYNE GWILLIAMS show.Big involvement on christian city churches behalf.On a better note it would appear that Chris is just trying to make herself famous from someone elses expense.
Interesting that you should mention pinball machines Gary.C3 rigs the machine and then you put your money in the slot.If you have enough self confidence you can earn extra balls.And if your better than them at the game they will soon pull the plug on you.
“And if your better than them at the game they will soon pull the plug on you.”
Very true. They abhor those who show independence of thought, they are are very wary of anyone who presents as intelligent, they are are fearful of those with a good grasp of the Bible, and they are *absolutely terrified* of anyone who is genuinely filled with the Holy Spirit.
Their attitudes towards such people are a predictably toxic mix of fear and envy, and their knee-jerk reactions in repudiating opposing views and actively rejecting those who articulate them is a classically cultic response.
Hi Zorro,;Choice comment man!.And on the cultic note,hows about the MUMMA CHRIS feature on;” Just reading text, by Chris Pringle, on PDF for upcoming Everywoman 2012 Conference…..borderline mysticism or waffle? :)BIGGEST HUGS MUMMA CHRIS “.
Yes, they are friendly, enthusiastic, motivating, sociable, smiling, and outgoing people, attractive as friends and associates, even apparently sincere and well-meaning,but when they lure you into a side room and tell you that Jesus won’t help you and that you have to help yourself.Then it’s beyond time to go and do not look back.This has happened to me.It’s fascinating translating C3’s subliminal messages. The participant is not aware of the stimulus being presented.
I literally used to help move pinball machines from top floor of CCC thiroul.The pinball machines were for youth group entertainment.
Knew there was a connection between Chris Harvey, Sasha Alexander etc and C3. Thanks for clarifying eyes.
Hi Pronounce Truth;South Coast City Church(which is now C3)bought out the Cris Harvey tent crusade years back.The only reason they had to change there name from CCC And then too SCCC(South Coast City Church)was because Phil Pringle and his PHILISTINES were jealous.In the end Phil won anyway with a so much more better name C3(NOT).As for Sasha Alexander(I’m talking about DR.Sasha Alexander and his wife the so called Prophetess Anita)put money in the basket if i can make you fall on the floor.
Eyes, when Jacob wanted speckled and spotted cattle he put peeled branches in the watering trough in front of the eyes of the ones that mated. They gave birth to speckled and spotted young.The point is this , maybe Chris watched the pin ball machines so much that it went to her head and more specifically her brain? I am sure she has had pin ball machines in front of her eyes!
Eyes: sadly, we are the people that funded the tent of miracles back in the beginning and knew we were called into tent ministry. Now to hear this…
So we’re art critics now?
ITGYA,
If you tread in a pile of dog droppings, you don’t need to be an “art critic” to know that it stinks.
Phil has claimed in the past to have a doctorate. He does not.
He claims to be a minister of the Gospel. He is not.
Why would it surprise anyone that he falsely lays claim to being a painter?
(Phil’s writing is also abysmal, and his speaking is powerless and altogether unconvincing. It seems that his one true gifting is as a postman).
How’s his claim false? Anyone who uses paintbrush and paint can call themselves a painter. It’s in the name.
ITGYA,
“Anyone who uses paintbrush and paint can call themselves a painter.”
So you’ve had a light bulb moment! Excellent!
Now we simply need to do a bit of logical extrapolation: anyone who picks up a Bible and attracts a following of impressionable people who aren’t averse to being parted from their money can call themselves a “preacher”. (Those who attract enough people to fund impressive buildings can even put it about that they are “leaders” and “apostles”, or they can perhaps let others refer to them as such with demurring).
“It’s in the name”.
How right you are! Some preach in the name of Christ to glorify God, some come in their own name as self-aggrandising money-grubbing frauds. It’s not hard for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear to spot the difference.
I do believe that there’s hope for you yet.
Yeah… I was actually just talking about paint there.
“Yeah… I was actually just talking about paint there.”
I know. I was actually pointing out that someone who claims to be a painter, and who clearly is not, will have no trouble claiming to be other things that they clearly are not.
For example, they may claim to have a PhD when they do not, or they may claim to be a preacher when they are not, or they may claim to hear from God when they do not, or they may claim to be an accomplished writer or speaker when they are not. Or even, perhaps, all of those. (An inflated sense of self-worth and deep and nagging insecurities are what lie behind such claims, which are typically the preserve of self-absorbed navel gazers).
This is why I spoke of “logical extrapolation”: because in this instance we can logically deduce certain things about Phil’s character and his consequent behaviour by a simple process of extrapolation. That is to say, if he is kidding himself about being a painter, then he is likely to be kidding himself about other things as well, and his actions are likely to reflect that.
Not only that, but we can actually observe certain aspects of his conduct which lend considerable weight to our hypothesis. Phil genuinely believes that he can preach – that he is in fact, a dynamic communicator – he honestly believes that he is a capable writer, and so forth. He is self-deluded to the extent that he sees himself as a truly gifted polyglot, when in fact absolutely nothing of what he does betrays any particular talent at all, much less any sort of anointing from the Holy Spirit.
Phil used to work as a garbage collector and as a postman. There is absolutely nothing wrong with either of those jobs – any work that involves honest toil is an honourable enough endeavour, and is acceptable in God’s sight. He would have been best advised to stick to a career path involving one of those things, since he could have been working comfortably within the limits of his natural and spiritual giftings, and would have avoided all the stress that comes when we presumptuously grasp at things for which we are simply not destined in God.
I trust that the above clarifies matters for you.
Correction: that should read “truly gifted polymath”, rather than “truly gifted polyglot”.
I don’t believe that Phil thinks he has any particular facility with languages (he struggles on gamely with English, for which one must give him at least some credit).
(Chris(From C3 Art Studios)says she’s his “white mama”.Wasn’t that a Bette Davis film?WHITE MAMA?
ITGYA check out my artwork in Facebook under Gary MacDougall and Gary’s Venetian Courtyard and you will see that I know a little about art. Considering I started drawing at about 3 years old and am a similar age to Phil you will see that I have been drawing and painting a while. Also I have been a landscape architect for about 35 years and this requires artistic skill. At the time Phil was saved and throwing bits of oil at canvas I produced one A1 full colour poster in the thousands, and several monocolour posters in the thousands of prints.
Zorro nailed it perfectly with this comment:-
“If you tread in a pile of dog droppings, you don’t need to be an “art critic” to know that it stinks.”
Phil would have been more useful with his garbage collecting and witnessing to people as he picked up their rubbish.
That is the extent of his grey matter up top. He is not a doctor’s you know what!
Hi Roundhouse, that’s ok. But something to consider, women in church are not restricted from public praying or prophesying (1Cor 11:5), only from having spiritual teaching authority over men, a position that God ordained in the church (a blog is not a pulpit by the way).
Not because we see men as necessarily better teachers, or that women are somehow inferior. It’s simply the way that God has designed the church to function, still allowing women to have a ministry focus with God’s plan i.e. Teaching other women & children (Titus 2:3-5)
1 Tim 2:13-14 takes us back to Genesis so this is not a cultural issue but rather an order of creation, giving God’s decision on the matter from the outset.
What is important to note, however, is here we do have a woman clearly pointing out, again on a blog, not in a pulpit, that there’s some serious mishandling of the bible going on here (by a woman) at Presence 2012.
To bring this serious issue down to a level of “not being biblical to read a woman’s blog” as if it goes against scripture is just plain silly. There are greater issues at stake here for those who really care how Gods Word is rightly divided.
Could you please clarify your point?
Remembering that God’s admonition against women preaching/teaching only refers to being pastors over men in the context of conducting meetings. They don’t have that spiritual authority. Scripture nowhere gives them that authority.
Whereas women were the authority in the worship of Artemus in Ephesus, “1 Timothy nowhere mentions Artemis, nor does Paul mention Artemis worship as a reason for restrictions in 1 Tim 2:11-12.”
I would rather hear a donkey preach the truth than a man or woman speak falsely in order to deceive believers.If it is written that women should remain silent within the assembly, well than so be it!
A call for prayerful discernment would be appropriate for everyone(whether man or woman) so as to not be deceived by the cunning and craftiness of anyone who FAKES the role of a spiritual christian teacher.
There’s no way you can get away with this huge theology “fail”.
God Himself has taken this decree away from cultural boundaries by taking the context back to Genesis.
As I said before “1 Tim 2:13-14 takes us back to Genesis so this is not a cultural issue but rather an order of creation, giving God’s decision on the matter from the outset.”
1000 years from now if the Lord delays His coming, the scriptures will still apply – THEY are timeless and this “modern church” you talk about may no longer be considered or remembered (except perhaps as being very worldly and self-seeking rather than Christ focused).
Smiley faces and outside “links” always take me into moderation, there’s no censorship here (unless there’s vulgarity?).
And you got your theology degree where?
Our life is measured by God’s grace and mercy towards us from the foundation of the earth, so the “closed book” is certainly His Word “Sola Scriptura”.
That’s a “closed book” I’m prepared to uphold and cherish as I walk out MY grace-filled walk. May your life be so blessed.
That was the best article I have read so far.